Define the trigger and result
Which request starts the task? What output would a reviewer accept? Specify the inputs and the cases that are out of scope.
Arrow AI Systems / Pilot planning
Turn a repeatable business task into a bounded AI pilot. Define the inputs, keep the right decisions with your team, and measure the whole task before expanding automation.
A practical delivery approach from Arrow AI. Project scope and terms are agreed individually.
Choose a useful starting point
A good candidate has a repeatable trigger, accessible evidence, and someone who can judge the output. A support draft, document classification, or an internal request summary can provide a focused starting point.
Keep the first boundary narrow enough to review. If the inputs are inconsistent or no one owns the outcome, clarify the process before adding automation.
Check your system readiness →
Your one-page brief
Which request starts the task? What output would a reviewer accept? Specify the inputs and the cases that are out of scope.
Define what the system can read, propose, and change. Name the reviewer and the fallback for missing evidence or an unavailable service.
Record the current process, choose representative cases, and define acceptance criteria before comparing results. Include review and correction effort.
Illustrative example
A specialist selects an eligible product question. The assistant drafts an answer from the applicable documentation and shows the supporting source. A person reviews the draft before use.
Sending replies, changing accounts, making contractual promises, and answering from documents the user cannot access. Missing evidence routes the task to the support team.
This is a proposed design example, not a customer deployment or a measured result. The pilot's value must be established through reviewed tasks.
From pilot to operation
A handoff needs named owners, source maintenance, a review guide, and recovery instructions. Rehearse a failure with the operating team before expanding the workflow.
FAQ
No. This page describes a planning and delivery approach. Scope, integrations, hosting, timelines, and commercial terms must be agreed for the specific project.
Yes. Drafting or recommending an action for human review can be a useful first scope. Writing to another system needs its own permissions, validation, and recovery rules.
Work with Arrow
Start with the task, its inputs, and the person who owns the result. We can discuss whether a bounded AI system fits the work.
The GEO audit covers public AI visibility. Workflow implementation has a separate scope.