Arrow 
Describe the actual fee basis and consultation process, including meaningful exclusions and expense conditions. Keep general information distinct from an agreed engagement for a specific matter.
Explain the basis before publishing an amount.
A fixed-fee service, hourly arrangement and scoped estimate answer different questions. State which approach applies to the actual service and what the firm needs to assess the matter. A broad starting figure without its conditions can leave the reader with the wrong impression.
Do not assume an AI summary will reproduce every qualification. Put important conditions in the relevant readable passage and connect them to the fee statement rather than isolating them in an unrelated footer.
From a general fee question to a confirmed engagement.
- 01ServiceWhat work is being considered?
- 02BasisHow is the fee approached?
- 03ScopeWhat needs assessment?
- 04ConfirmFollow the firm’s actual process.
Review the applicable professional rules.
ABA Model Rule 1.5 addresses communicating the fee basis and expenses. It is a model rule, not a substitute for the rules applicable to a particular firm or jurisdiction. The responsible lawyer should review the actual wording.
Similarly, a fee explanation should not imply a guaranteed result or a representation agreement arising simply from reading the page. Describe the firm’s actual intake and engagement process accurately. This article is editorial guidance about public information.
Give the fee statement a clear context.
Basis
The charging approach.
Conditions
Scope, exclusions and expenses.
Intake
How a matter is assessed.
Answer what a prospective client needs before contact.
Clarify whether an initial consultation has a charge, what general information the firm needs and how the next step is confirmed. Do not encourage detailed confidential submissions through a form that is unsuitable for that purpose.
The fictional comparison below separates an unexplained price from a usable quote process. It does not recommend a legal fee or establish what the firm may charge. The actual service and professional review determine the published offer.
Would the prospective client understand the next step?
An attractive starting amount.
No explanation of included work or expenses.
State the actual charging basis and relevant conditions.
Explain how the firm assesses and confirms the matter.
Keep fee information consistent.
Review the service page, consultation page and approved proposal materials together when terms change. Assign one owner to the current wording and remove competing versions. An archived article should not be presented as the source of a current fee.
Use accurate text for the important conditions. A decorative legal image cannot establish the scope of representation, expense treatment or qualifications. Link to the appropriate contact process for a matter-specific assessment.
Inspect summaries for material omissions.
Save a dated answer and any cited page when a summary appears to misstate the firm’s fees. Compare the claim with the actual approved wording. Distinguish an outdated source from an inaccurate generated interpretation before deciding what to correct.
Continue with the law-firm visibility guide and the factual correction method. Keep consultation outcomes separate from answer mentions.
Sources and editorial scope
This is Arrow AI editorial guidance. Diagrams and examples illustrate a method, not client results or platform ranking factors. Clear information and source access do not guarantee a recommendation. Platform-specific facts are attributed to the sources below.
The Arrow read
Make the next decision clearer.
See what your customers can understand today, then improve the source or workflow that answers their next question. Start with a free GEO audit.